We’re now 20 games into 2010/11 so it’s time to compare this season with 2009/10 once again. As we’re only four points better off than the last post, the gap to last year, however you slice or dice it, has grown. After the first 20 games last year, we had 35 points and by comparing the same fixtures, apples for apples, we had 32 points compared to 21 points this year.

We’ve conceded twice as many goals than we had at this same stage last year, but continue to struggle at the other end, averaging barely more than a goal per game. We’ve failed to score in seven games so far compared with only three during the same period last season and kept only four clean sheets this term, but seven last year.

Crucially, we haven’t kept a clean sheet since the Birmingham derby at the end of October, that’s 10 games now. Houllier has correctly identified that as a key issue and will have to be a point of focus for Sunderland at Villa Park on Wednesday; I don’t think there was ever much reasonable expectation of a clean sheet at Stamford Bridge, even with four centre halves!

Season Pld W D L GF GA Pts
2010/11 20 5 6 9 23 36 21
2009/10 Chron 20 10 5 5 29 18 35
2009/10 Apples 20 8 8 4 30 23 32

It has to be recognised, as it could be hugely significant for our whole season; the result at Chelsea, while it hasn’t made a huge dent into the comparisons here, the 3-3 draw is a considerable improvement on the 7-1 drubbing last season.

However, no one should pretend that we’re no longer in the mire. We are, right up to our waist. For the first time this season, based on our current pace, our projected finishing points tally is right on the bubble of the perceived safety of 40 points. This season is likely to require more though, the pace must be improved.

Season Pts/gm GF/gm GA/gm GF/GA W% D% L%
2010/11 1.05 1.15 1.80 0.64 25.0% 30.0% 45.0%
2009/10 Chron 1.75 1.45 0.90 1.61 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%
2009/10 Apples 1.60 1.50 1.15 1.30 40.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Projections: 40 44 68

Graphs

As we’re past the half way point, there’s some value in bringing the charts back to plot our relative fortunes graphically and it’s every bit as disturbing as you might imagine.

The regular reader will be familiar with both techniques I’m using here, but for those that haven’t seen these before, I’m simply plotting the cumulative effect on goal difference and applying the same principle to “win difference”.

The cumulative win difference chart simply increases by one with a win, stays the same with a draw and is decreased by one for a loss. It’s more useful as a general illustration of fortunes over a larger period of time, but does a fine job here for our comparative purposes.

Cumulative Goal Difference

Cumulative Win Difference

Cumulative Points

I wouldn’t normally include this chart as it can only ever increase or stay the same, poor runs of form can easily be lost and comparisons with previous seasons generally show two lines following a similar path. However, as we’re so far behind last season, that’s not the case and it’s worth annotating a projection of “safety” which I’ve arbitrarily chosen as 42 points.

Greater context

This is not the worst Premier League season we’ve seen at this stage, that honour belongs to 1994/95′s 17 point haul, but it’s certainly worse than anything in recent memory.

Incidentally, the 38 points we had in 2008/09 were just a point shy of the best Premier League season at 20 games; 1998/99, but the 2-1 win over West Brom in game 21 opened a purple patch of eight games that provided the record points haul at that stage of a Premier League season.

Sadly, as you will no doubt recall, that hot run of form tailed off and we limped to the finishing line taking 10 points from the final 10 games, ending the 2008/09 season with 62 points. It would take title winning form from here to the end of the season just to match that now.

Right now, I’d settle for the 1.39 points per game average we’ve seen in the league so far this century prior to this season, that will get us to the finish line safely to re-group in the summer. Hopefully I can report that we’re on the road to achieving that when the series continues at the 25 game mark.

You might also like...

9 Comments to “This Season vs Last Season #11”

  1. Badger 3 January 2011 at 10:37 pm #

    “Crucially, we haven’t kept a clean sheet since the Birmingham derby at the end of October, that’s 10 games now. Houllier has correctly identified that as a key issue”

    Took him long enough though, didn’t it?
    It didn’t take an Einstein to work that out, did it?

    Play to our strengths, which includes getting Dunne onside until he thinks he’s got someone better, instead of trying to wind him up, imo.

    I actually like the cumulative wins and GD graphics, as I’m hoping they show the bottom of a plateau.

    Keep up the good work Dan, as I’m loving your analysis.
    No-one else does this type of thing on the Villa blogs, as far as I know.

    • Dan 4 January 2011 at 12:37 am #

      thanks badger, i enjoy pulling this one together. it’s pretty simple to write and easy to extract the info from.

      i have a win difference chart versus newcastle 2008/09 to publish, they were in a very similar spot to us at the moment, but the slide down to the bottom right corning from this point in their chart is alarming.

      would be nice to see us turn this season back up a bit, but i’ll take plateau. plateau is good. without getting ahead of myself, at least it will make the comparison next season more encouraging! ;)

      i think the clean sheet comments were just part of the usual media cycle tbh, but 10 games without a shut out is definitely significant. sunderland offers a good opportunity to register a blank hopefully.

  2. Badger 3 January 2011 at 10:52 pm #

    Oops.
    And the cumulative points.
    I actually think that shows the safety thing very well.

    Your arbitrary 42 points works for me.

    I don’t know if 40 is going to cut it this year, seeing how many games the “big boys” are losing.

    • Dan 4 January 2011 at 12:39 am #

      yeah, i think someone will go down with 40 points or more this season. just not us!

  3. Badger 4 January 2011 at 1:27 am #

    “i have a win difference chart versus newcastle 2008/09 to publish”

    I’m not so convinced about that one mate :- (

    • Dan 4 January 2011 at 2:09 am #

      part of the R word study series, mate. i won’t sugar coat anything, we really are in a very bad place. but we will get out of it, we won’t go down, i’m positive.

  4. IdahoVillan 4 January 2011 at 3:23 pm #

    Dan, not to give you more work but it might be interesting to compare the first half of this season vs. the last half of the past 2 or 3 seasons. This year we have been hammered by injuries which have left key players out of the lineup – the past few years we have had a serious drop-off, due to over-playing players, fitness, etc. (sort of like injuries).

    I guess I’m hoping that our traditional end-of-year swan dive came at the start and the second half will be a fully-fit, full-strength squad (with a few newcomers, I hope :) )

    • Dan 4 January 2011 at 4:30 pm #

      i should probably revisit this post from last february at some point:-

      http://astonvillacentral.com/2010/02/sad-fact-beware-the-ides-of-march/

      there is a certain wisdom to speculating that we’ll do better with key players coming back at this stage of the season with far less playing time under their belts than in the past.

      that is based on an assumption, however logical, that fatigue was the most significant factor in our season tailing off in the past. i imagine that had to be a factor, but not convinced it’s that simple.

      but yes, if the issues have been resolved, the injuries over, the team together and confidence restored, there’s no reason why we can’t put together one of the better endings to a season.

      if so, carry that through the summer, making some personnel changes and maybe take that into next season. anything’s possible.

  5. Badger 5 January 2011 at 2:12 am #

    “that is based on an assumption, however logical, that fatigue was the most significant factor in our season tailing off in the past. i imagine that had to be a factor, but not convinced it’s that simple.”

    Nor am I.
    How is it that we were “fatigued” in the second half of previous seasons, but now apparently are unfit and need extra training?
    The two simply don’t fit.
    And surely training twice as hard, 4 or 5 days a week, is going to fatigue you more????

    Unless of course, the players did absolutely nothing during training?

    I just don’t see it.

    Interestingly, I thought we faded more against Chelsea than any game I can remember for ages.
    Go figure.


Leave a Reply